When Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari expressed his
desire recently to come to India to pay a visit to Ajmer Dargah he had no
political agenda in the mind. Had there been some politics therein, it would have
been only to the extent that cordial relations between the two countries might
develop. After initial hesitations, the Government of India agreed to this
visit only on this ground. But when Pakistan President reached New Delhi in the
morning of Arp 8 and was face to face with the Prime Minister of India, he had
to face the havoc of Hafiz Sayeed. Zardari was ready for this only to the
extent that before leaving for New Delhi he had sought advice from his
officials as to what he would say if this question is raised. Therefore he said
it required further discussion. On the other hand, Dr. Manmohan Singh, even
unwillingly, wanted to put this question before him; this was his helplessness.
Because he is the Prime Minister of the Congress government, which fears Sangh
Parivar in this matter. And Sangh Parivar is the representative of the
mentality which exerts influence on government policies. Knowledgeable persons
know that whosoever is in the saddle at the Centre, it is this mentality that
formulates basic policies.
Commentary of a Muslim analyst
It is a matter of somewhat satisfaction that certain
independent analysts have seen the purpose of Zardari’s visit exactly in the
same way as Zardari described it, viz. developing cordial relations. Saeed
Naqvi, a renowned journalist of the English language, has explained it thus:
‘Pakistani President has given a Sufi message by paying a visit to Ajmer
Dargah. Asif Ali Zardari’s trip to the dargah of Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin
Chishti must be applauded as this trip has taken place at a time when religious
extremism is increasing in both the countries.’ But the gist of Mr. Naqvi’s
commentary published in The Hindu (Apr 9) is the same as would please
all anti-Islam forces and those who love to see disorder in rank of Muslim
Ummah. The first thing is that even to such senior and well-aware journalists
Hafiz Saeed and his group Al-Dawa is what the US administration, Government of
India and international media try to make the world believe. Then, an attempt
has been also made in this article to present Sufism, Khanquahism and Wahdat
ul Wajood (oneness of Being) as “true” and “real” Islam by declaring the
Islam based on the Qur’ān and Sunnah and the Seerah of the Holy Prophet as
Salfism, Wahabism, Deobandism, extremism and narrow-minded.
America also wants this
And of course America wants this. After the 9/11
drama, the strategy it has devised to counter the Islamic faith includes,
besides conspiracies and countless tactics, disenchanting the Muslim Ummah from
Islam by promoting Sufism, Khanquahism and Wahdat ul Wajood. The
American media has been out to promote this view continuously. In America
itself institutions are being set up for this purpose. – Then, would it be
quite wrong to say that our own men of letters and analysts are also influenced
by the propaganda unconsciously, if not consciously? However it is expected of
sincere analysts like Saeed Naqvi that in the situation when the Muslim Ummah
is at face with great crisis they would bring the truth in the limelight after
research and investigation. – And so far as Hafiz Saeed is concerned, as per
our information he is a religious missionary and his group Al-Dawa is working
for Dawah and Tableegh and service to humanity in Pakistan; he says that he has
nothing to do even with Lashkar-e-Taiba. (Indian Express, Apr 6) He says
he is quite disconnected with 6/11 and condemns this event.
Believing in propaganda doesn’t be hove Muslims
But, if armed jihad is included in the group of Hafiz
Muhammad Saeed, it is the work of Pakistani Ulema to see to it if it really is
then in what form, what is its probability in the eye of Shari’ah, (and)
whether it is beyond the limitations of Shari’ah. A Muslim can never believe
that a group working for Islamic cause can kill the innocent, children, women,
elderly persons, the sick, weak and armless. In fact, this is a very deep
conspiracy to defame Islam, Islamic injunctions and Islamic terminologies. We
Indian Muslims have no direct relation with Pakistani politics and the events
taking place over there. We are concerned only to the extent that under the
pretext of opposing Pakistan and Pakistani groups efforts are being made to
defame the entire Muslim Ummah and we Indian Muslims are also part of the
Ummah. If American dispensation, Government of India or media declares an
individual or group as terrorist, one may follow the suit to meet the
requirements of false patriotism but our Iman (faith) and the real
interest of our country do not permit us to do so without any investigation.
Not as a Muslim journalist but as a senior and responsible one, Saeed Naqvi
ought to analyse the events and developments.
13/04/12 khabar-O-Nazar by Parwaaz Rahmani, sehrozaDAWAT, translated by: Abu Yusuf
Pakistani President's visit must be seen in the wider perspective of events in Afghanistan. India is hedging its options, if the Taliban come over, before or after US and NATO leave the country. In Taliban eyes, India will be viewed as ally of US/NATO and that will make Indian position very precarious. India therefore has to cozy up to Pakistan so that Pakistan's good offices may be used to soften any Taliban design further south. However, the move suits Pakistan too, both at the level of civilian government as well as the military establishment. The deterioration of relations with US has to be offset with whatever Pakistan can get out of improved relations with India. The opening of trade will take out the key bottleneck that had paralyzed South-West sub-continent's immense prospect to access Central Asia with two way trade benefits. Let us hope US and NATO invasion will remain as a temporary nightmare that we all in this area had to suffer. The opening of trade should normalize the conditions in the region, when it could shift from a war economy to peace economy.
ReplyDelete